Showing posts with label output. Show all posts
Showing posts with label output. Show all posts

Thursday, 17 January 2019

Audi Changes Naming Scheme To Include Each Model's Power Output

Thanks to turbochargers and hybrids, engine displacement is no longer indicative of performance.

The Germans are quite good at sifting through confusing nomenclature. Just think, these are the same people that invented the enigma and the confusing numerical and alphabetical combinations they use to name their cars are indicative of this. And now, as we find ourselves on the cusp of change brought on by electric drivetrains, German automakers are having to change badges up once more in order to properly advertise to the world how much power each model makes.

BMW, Mercedes, and Audi have all coined names for their electric car brands, with i, EQ, and e-tron being the respective designations for these three German automakers. Mercedes had to break rank when it decided add the “53” suffix to the AMG CLS model in order to designate it as a hybrid AMG model, and now Audi has just announced that it will do something similar, although its change in name scheme won’t be exclusive to performance models. Instead, it will reflect a vehicle’s power output, a move done in order to disassociate engine displacement from a model name given that turbocharging technology and electrification has made it so that displacement isn’t necessarily reflective of power output.

Future Audis will see two numbers that designate power output in kilowatts. This goes for cars with internal combustion engines, hybrids, and fully electric models in the lineup. For vehicles making between 81 and 96 kilowatts (108-128 horsepower), Audi will use the number 30. The number 45 will stand in for vehicles making between 169 and 185 kW (226-248 horsepower), while Audi’s top line performance models, those making above 400 kW (536 horsepower), will garner the 70 moniker. Model series names, from A1 to Q7, will remain the same, however the numbers will replace previously used designations. For example, the new A8, the first model to see this change, will be badged as an A8 50 TDI when spec’d with the 3.0-liter diesel V6.

An A8 buyer who selects the 3.0-liter V6 gasoline engine will receive an Audi bearing A8 55 TFSI badges. Soon after, all Audi model series launched on the market will get the new performance designations in order to help us determine which Four Rings vehicles we can beat to the next stoplight and which we should lay off of. It might be confusing at first, especially because us Americans aren’t used to using kilowatts as a stand in for horsepower and because the numbers are more of a ranking rather than a direct reflection of output. Either way, the fact Germany has found a way to make naming its cars more complicated should surprise no one.

Friday, 31 August 2018

Tesla wins dismissal of shareholder lawsuit over Model 3 output

UPDATED: 8/27/18 6:03 pm ET - adds details

A federal judge in San Francisco dismissed a securities fraud lawsuit in which Tesla Inc. shareholders accused the electric car company and CEO Elon Musk of misleading them about the progress of production of the Model 3 vehicle.

In a decision made public on Monday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said that while shareholders claimed that Tesla fell short of its production goals, "federal securities laws do not punish companies for failing to achieve their targets."

Breyer said the shareholders have until Sept. 28 to amend their complaint. Their lawyer, Laurence Rosen, did not respond to a request for comment.

The case is separate from lawsuits accusing Tesla and Musk of scheming to hurt short-sellers through Musk's Aug. 7 tweets about taking the company private, and that funding had been "secured."

Musk abandoned that proposal late Friday night.

Tesla formally launched the Model 3 in July 2017, touting it as a vehicle for the masses, and attracted deposits from more than 500,000 potential customers.

But shareholders said Musk knew Tesla was "woefully unprepared" to meet its production goal of 5,000 Model 3s per week, and that Tesla's share price was inflated until after the company finally cut its production target last November.

!function(d, s) {var ip = d.createElement(s);ip.async = 1, s = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], ip.src = "//s.idio.co/ip.js", s.parentNode.insertBefore(ip, s)}(document, "script");$(function() { $idoWidget = $('#idio-article-recommendations-8'); $imageContainer = $idoWidget.prev().prev(); $imageEle = $imageContainer.children('img'); if ($imageEle && $imageEle.length > 0) { $imageContainer.insertAfter($idoWidget); }});

Belief in the Model 3 had helped propel Tesla's share price 62 percent higher in the 1-1/2 years after the company unveiled it in March 2016.

But the judge said shareholders failed to show that Tesla needed to be clearer that Model 3 production could fall short.

The company eventually blamed its production shortfall on "bottlenecks" at its battery factory outside Reno, Nevada and its assembly plant in Fremont, Calif.

"Plaintiffs are correct that defendants' qualifications would not have been meaningful if defendants had known that it was impossible for Tesla to meet its stated production goals, not merely highly unlikely," Breyer wrote. "The facts plaintiffs have put forth do not tend to establish that this was the case."

Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Breyer's decision is dated Aug. 24.

ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.


View the original article here